NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Reliance Financial Services v Lemery Holdings [2006] NSWSC 1079
HEARING DATE(S) : 7 September; 9 October 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 October 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
DECISION : Parties to bring in Short Minutes.
CATCHWORDS : PROFESSIONS AND TRADES - lawyers - authority to bring proceedings - authority to receive money pursuant to an order - analysis of capacity in which solicitor is acting when he or she uses available funds to pay a bill of the solicitor - PROCEDURE - miscellaneous procedural matters - Mareva orders - distinction between Mareva orders and orders for preservation of property concerning which a property right is claimed
LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 Legal Profession Act 2004
Alka Developments P/L v Lemery Holdings P/L [2005] NSWSC 1335 Armstrong v Sheppard & Short Ltd [1959] 2 QB 384 Liggins v Inge (1831) 7 Bing 682; 131 ER 263 CASES CITED : Minister of Health v Bellotti and another [1944] 1 KB 298 Naylor v Canterbury Park Racecourse Co Ltd (1935) 35 SR (NSW) 281 Reliance Financial Services v Lemery Holdings [2005] NSWSC 651 Reliance Financial Services v Lemery Holdings [2006] NSWSC 709 Winter v Brockwell (1807) 8 East 308, 103 ER 359
Lemery Holdings Pty Ltd - First Defendant/Applicant PARTIES : Tzovaras Legal - Respondent Ted Tzovaras - Respondent John Tomaras - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3696/05
P Lowe - Applicant COUNSEL : M Maxwell (7/9/06) - Respondents T Hall, solicitor (9/10/06) - Respondents
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate