NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Raymond v Public Trustee [2006] NSWSC 489
HEARING DATE(S) : 27 and 28 April 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 May 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice McLaughlin at 1
DECISION : (1). I order that the summons be dismissed. (2). I order that the Plaintiffs pay the costs of the Defendant, such costs to be on the party and party basis. (3). I order that the Defendant be entitled to recoup from the estate of the late Stanley Norman Crunkhorn ("the Deceased") the difference between the foregoing costs which he may recover from the Plaintiffs and the costs of the Defendant on the indemnity basis. (4). The exhibits may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Succession. Family Provision. Claims by two adult children. Financial and material circumstances of Plaintiffs. Obligation upon applicant for provision to place before the Court as fully and as frankly as possible all available information concerning her or his financial and material circumstances. Asserted needs of Plaintiffs. Whether each Plaintiff has been left without adequate provision for her or his maintenance. Competing claim of chief beneficiary, who was also a child of Deceased. Plaintiffs must establish their claims upon their own merits. Claims of Plaintiffs cannot be established, or enhanced, by proving that chief beneficiary, had he been an applicant for provision, might have been unsuccessful in his claim.
LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982.
Blore v Lang (1960) 104 CLR 124 CASES CITED : Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 79 ALJR 731
Susan Raymond (first named Plaintiff) PARTIES : Trevor Crunkhorn (second named Plaintiff) Public Trustee (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate