NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 61 ACSR 27
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Michael Jeffrey Hawksford & Ors v Brett Paul Hawksford & Ors;Brett Paul Hawksford & Ors v Michael Jeffrey Hawksford & Ors [2006] NSWSC 1458
HEARING DATE(S) : 18/12/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 18 December 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : White J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12/18/2006
DECISION : See paragraph 43 of judgment.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS – Membership, rights and remedies – Members' remedies and internal disputes – Proceedings on behalf of company by member – Progression of proceedings no. 4348/04 and proceedings no. 3487/05 deadlocked by failure of natural parties to resolve question of corporate parties' representation – Where both proceedings have consumed substantial judicial resources and threaten to continue to do so – Whether exercise of Court's powers to facilitate just, quick and cheap resolution of real issues in both proceedings inconsistent with Chapter 2F Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – s 79 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) considered – Held that exercise of Court's powers under s 61 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) and s 23 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) not inconsistent with Corporations Act – Order that each natural party have leave to defend, on behalf of the corporate parties, claims which the opposite natural party is bringing against the corporate parties.
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
CASES CITED : Hawksford v Hawksford [2005] NSWSC 463
Michael Jeffrey Hawksford & Ors v PARTIES : Brett Paul Hawksford & Ors; Brett Paul Hawksford & Ors v Michael Jeffrey Hawksford & Ors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate