NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Jenkins [2006] NSWCCA 412
HEARING DATE(S): 14/12/2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 December 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Simpson J at 1; Barr J at 2; Hoeben J at 3
DECISION: Crown appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Crown appeal against sentence - maliciously inflict grievous bodily harm with intent to do grievous bodily harm contrary to s33 of Crimes Act 1900 - incorrect use of standard non-parole period - restraint to be exercised in Crown appeal.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 at 671 Malvaso v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 227 at 234 Markarian v Regina (2005) 79 ALJR 1048 at [25] – [27] R v AJP (2004) 150 A Crim R 575 R v Allpas (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 CASES CITED: R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v GJ Davies [2004] NSWCCA 319 R v Holder and Johnstone (1983) 3 NSWLR 245 at 256 R v McGourty [2002] NSWCCA 335 at [45] R v Papazis (1991) 51 A Crim R 242 at 247 R v Tait (1979) 46 FLR 386 at 388 Regina v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 R v Way (2006) 60 NSWLR 168 at [116-118] Tidona v Regina [2005] NSWCCA 410 Wong and Leung v The Queen (2001) 76 ALJR 79
PARTIES: Crown - Applicant Tyneal Jenkins - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate