NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Crago v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 68
HEARING DATE(S): 19/04/06
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 April 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1, 67; James J at 2; Hoeben J at 68
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 04/19/2006
DECISION: Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal allowed. Applicant re-sentenced
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – SENTENCE – guilty plea – firing a firearm in a manner likely to endanger the safety of a specified person – using a firearm with intent to commit an indictable offence – maliciously damaging a motor vehicle – possessing a firearm without being authorised to do so – air rifle – whether the sentencing judge failed to give effect to the finding of special circumstances – whether sentencing judge failed to take into account totality – whether sentence manifestly excessive
Crimes Act LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act Firearms Act
Crimes Act CASES CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act Firearms Act
PARTIES: Christopher Robert CRAGO v REGINA
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/21
COUNSEL: M Johnston - Applicant Dr P Power SC - Crown
SOLICITORS: Steve O'Connor - Applicant S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) - Crown
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/21/3158; 04/21/0175
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Marien DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 03/04/2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/21
HODGSON JA JAMES J HOEBEN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate