NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Dimitrelos v 14 Martin Place Pty Limited & 3 Ors [2007] NSWCA 85
HEARING DATE(S): 29/3/07
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 June 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Young CJ in Eq at 2; Bell J at 21
DECISION: 1. Dismiss the appeal; 2. The appellant is to pay the respondents' costs.
Chappel v Hart [1998] HCA 55; 195 CLR 232 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; 214 CLR 118 Greetings Oxford Koala Hotel Pty Ltd v Oxford Square Investments Pty Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 33 CASES CITED: Haseldine v C A Daw and Son Ltd [1941] 2 KB 343 Piening v Wanless (1968) 117 CLR 498 Schellenberg v Tunnel Holdings Pty Limited [2000] HCA 18; 200 CLR 121 Swan v Salisbury Construction Company Ltd [1966] 1 WLR 204 Waterways Authority v Fitzgibbon [2005] HCA 57; 79 ALJR 1816
Bill Dimitrelos (Appellant) 14 Martin Place Pty Limited (First Respondent) PARTIES: Rebel Property Group Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) KONE Elevators Pty Ltd (Third Respondent) Chersteron International (NSW) Pty Limited (Fourth Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40256/06
Ms S Norton SC / Ms M Fraser (Appellant) COUNSEL: Mr D Cutler (1st, 2nd and 4th Respondents) Mr C Locke (3rd Respondent)
Brydens Law Office (Appellant) SOLICITORS: Abbott Tout (1st, 2nd and 4th Respondents) Goldrick Farrell Mullan (3rd Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2324/04
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Truss DCJ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40256/06
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate