NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Parker v Parker [2006] NSWSC 473
HEARING DATE(S) : 05/05/2006 JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 05/05/2006
DECISION : In lieu of provisions of Will, legacies of $47,000, $80,000 and $25,000 to plaintiffs with residue to defendant. Costs recoverable by first and third plaintiffs capped at $20,000 and $45,000. Indemnity costs in favour of second plaintiff.
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION - Family provision – claims by 3 of 6 adult children of deceased – estate of $347,000 left to defendant eldest son – no claims by surviving former spouse – no needs-based claim by beneficiary – claim by first plaintiff compromised for $47,000 – circumstances of second plaintiff change adversely after death – substantial need for maintenance established – third plaintiff establishes modest contribution-based claim for advancement – priority of obligation to provide for maintenance over obligation to provide for advancement – legacies of $80,000 to second plaintiff and $25,000 to third plaintiff – COSTS – where small estate with multiple claims – relevance of "rule of thumb" that plaintiff's costs in such claims should be limited to $35,000 – relevance of amount recovered – recoverable costs capped – Indemnity costs – where plaintiff betters offer of compromise – indemnity costs from date of offer.
LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW)
Bosch v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [1938] AC 463 Deves v Porter [2003] NSWSC 878 Moore v Moore [2004] NSWSC 587 CASES CITED : Re Fulop (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Stewart v McDougal (NSWSC, Young J, 19 November 1987, unreported) Van Zonneveld v Seaton (No 2) [2005] NSWSC 175
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate