NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v AA [2006] NSWCCA 55 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 31 January 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Hulme J at 3; Rothman J at 21
DECISION: Appeal by the Crown against sentence be dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentence - Crown appeal - sentence close to expiry - manifest excess - residual discretion
LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912
R v MD, BM, NA, JT [2005] NSWCCA 342 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 Dinsdale v R (2000 202 CLR 321 Lowndes v R (1999) 195 CLR 665 R v Tait (1979) 46 FLR 386 at 388 Wong and Leung v R (2001) 76 ALJR 79 Malvaso v R (1989) 168 CLR 227 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 Griffiths v R (1977) 137 CLR 293 CASES CITED: Everett v R (1994) 181 CLR 295 R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 R v Papazis (1991) 51 A Crim R 242 R v Holder and Johnston (1983) 2 NSWLR 245 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Kalache [2000] NSWCCA 2 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v Harmouche [2005] NSWCCA 398 R v Prasad (2004) 147 A Crim R 385 R v Abboud [2005] NSWCCA 251 Johnson v The Queen (2004) 78 ALJR 616 R v Brideson (1989) 166 CLR 338
PARTIES: The Crown Respondent: AA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate