NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Pascoe v Holyoake [2006] NSWSC 64
HEARING DATE(S) : 9 February 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 17 February 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Rein AJ
DECISION : Summons dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : JURISDICTION - Application to transfer proceedings from Administrative Decisions Tribunal to Supreme Court - retail lease - alleged breach of covenant for quiet enjoyment - retail tenancy claim lodged with Administrative Decisions Tribunal - potential third party claims - risk of inconsistent findings if aspects of matter dealt with separately in court and Tribunal - risk of additional cost to party if proceedings not transferred - inherent power of Supreme Court - interpretation of s 76 Retail Leases Act 1994 - whether Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear proceedings if transferred
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997, s 37 LEGISLATION CITED : Interpretation Act 1987, s 35 Retail Leases Act 1994, ss 63, 70, 71, 75, 76 and 76A Supreme Court Act 1970, s 23
Attorney General of NSW v World Best Holdings Ltd [2005] NSWCA 261 Bencross Pty Ltd v Teasdale [2003] NSWSC 54 Buzera Pty Ltd v Mezan Enterprises Pty Ltd (1998) NSW ConvR 55-851 CASES CITED : Commonwealth of Australia v Cockatoo Dockyard Pty Ltd (1995) 36 NSWLR 662 GPT Management Ltd v Spa Heaven Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 1043 Oriental Carpet Department Store Pty Ltd v Supacenta Pty Ltd (2003) 11 BPR 21,235 World Best Holdings Ltd v Sarker [2004] NSWSC 1164
Scott Darren Pascoe as administrator of the estate of the late Kut Sze Tu (Applicant) PARTIES : Paula Ann Holyoake (First Respondent) Jarpen Holdings Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Margaret Sze Tu (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate