NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina v Lodhi [2006] NSWSC 584
HEARING DATE(S) : 13/02/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 14 February 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Whealy J at 1
DECISION : Dismiss Notice of Motion on behalf of the accused
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law: Criminal Code Act (C'Wealth) - Terrorism offences - indictment - duplicity - failure to specify all essential matters - Particulars
Criminal Code Act 1995 Criminal Code Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003 Workers' Rehabilitation Compensation Act 1986 (SA) LEGISLATION CITED : Acts Interpretation Act 1915 (SA) Anti-Terrorism Act 2005 Road Transport (Safety and Management) Act 1999 Criminal Procedure Act 1986
Johnson v Miller (1937) 59 CLR 467 S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266 Stanton v Abernathy (1990) 19 NSWLR 656 Walsh v Tattersall (1996) CLR 77 Manwaring (1983) 2 NSWLR at 88 per Miles J (with whom Street CJ agreed) Romeyko v Samuels (1972) 2 SASR 529 at 552 per Bray CJ CASES CITED : DDP v Belani [2005] NSWSC 1013 at (48) John L Pty Limited v A.G. (NSW) (1987) 163 CLR 508, 520 Ex Parte Lovell re Buckley (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 153 at 173 per Jordan CJ R v Janceski (2005) NSWCCA 281 at (52) - (53) per Spigelman CJ R v Mai (1991) 26 NSWLR 371,377-378 per Hunt CJ at CL, Enderby and Allen JJ agreeing Eastman v DPP [2003] 214 CLR 318 per McHugh J at (22) Cook v Benson [2003] 214 CLR 370 per Kirby J at (61) R v Ul-Haque (unreported) Bell J 8 February 2006 at para 17
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate