NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Eye Corp Australia Pty Limited v Goliath Investments Pty Limited [2006] NSWSC 159
HEARING DATE(S) : 8 March 2006 JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 03/08/2006
DECISION : Plaintiff entitled to remove the sign and defendant ordered to co-operate.
CATCHWORDS : LEASE [33]- Tenant leased part of roof upon which was a commercially valuable sign- Lease expired- Tenant's right to remove sign- Trade fixture- Ownership of sign- Whether landlord must give consent for tenant's development application for removal of sign- Tenant entitled to remove sign and receive landlord's consent.
LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919, s 127
Bankstown CC v Alamdo Holdings Pty Ltd (2005) 79 ALJR 1511 Boyce v Grundy (1830) 28 US 377 Burns Philp Trust Co Pty Ltd v Kwikasair Freightlines Ltd (1963) 63 SR (NSW) 492 D'Arcy v Burelli Investments Pty Ltd (1987) 8 NSWLR 317 Greene v West Cheshire Railway Co (1871) LR 13 Eq 44 Horwich v Symond (1914) 110 LT 1016 CASES CITED : Horwich v Symond (1915) 84 LJKB 1083 JC Williamson Ltd v Lukey and Mulholland (1931) 45 CLR 282 Lambourn v McLellan [1903] 2 Ch 263 McMahon's (Transport) Pty Ltd v Ebbage [1999] 1 Qd R 185 Mowats Ltd v Hudson Brothers Ltd (1911) 105 LT 400 Re British Red Ash Collieries Ltd [1920] 1 Ch 326 Smith v City Petroleum Co Ltd [1940] 1 All ER 260 Starline Drive-in Theatre Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1964) 112 CLR 458
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate