NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Megna & anor v Marshall & anor; Tory v Marshall & anor [2006] NSWSC 70
HEARING DATE(S) : 2 February 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 2 February 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 02/02/2006
DECISION : Paragraphs [11] - [15]
CATCHWORDS : FAMILY LAW – Binding Financial Agreements – setting aside – Jurisdiction – Jurisdiction of Supreme Court under Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act (Cth) – Costs – circumstances justifying a costs order in proceedings under Family Law Act. COSTS – Proceedings under Family Law Act – third party proceedings to set aside financial agreement.
LEGISLATION CITED : Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss 40(3), 60G, 90K, 117 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth), s 4
CASES CITED : Megna v Marshall [2005] NSWSC 1302 Megna v Marshall [2005] NSWSC 1347
(10261/04) Michael Megna (first plaintiff) Russell James Lloyd (second plaintiff) David John Marshall (first defendant) PARTIES : Richard Martin Tory (second defendant) (6166/05) Richard Martin Tory (plaintiff) David John Marshall (first defendant) Shirley Irene Marshall (second defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10261/04; 6166/05
(10261/04) V Dominello (solicitor) (plaintiffs) D J Marshall (in person) (first defendant) COUNSEL : A T S Dawson (second defendant) (6166/05) A T S Dawson (plaintiff) D J Marshall (in person) (first defendant) A Clachers (solicitor) (second defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate