NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Idoport Pty Limited v National Australia Bank Limited, Idoport Pty Limited v Donald Robert Argus, Idoport Pty Limited v National Bank Limited & Ors [2006] NSWSC 1191
HEARING DATE(S) : Determined on the papers
JUDGMENT DATE : 14 November 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
DECISION : Notice of motion seeking further discovery dismissed. Notice to produce struck out.
CATCHWORDS : Practice and Procedure - Discovery - Notice to Produce - Insurance claim or settlement reached with an insurer by party entitled to costs not relevant in terms of being capable of rationally affecting assessment of any of issues to be litigated in gross sum costs application.
LEGISLATION CITED : Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
Angor Pty Ltd v Ilich Motor Co Pty Ltd (1992) 37 FCR 65 Hunt v Severs [1994] 2 AC 350 CASES CITED : National Australia Bank Ltd v Idoport Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 8 Parry v Cleaver [1970] AC 1 Screenco Pty Ltd v R L Dew Pty Ltd (2003) 58 NSWLR 720
Idoport Pty Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : National Australia Bank Limited (Defendant) Donald Robert Argus (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50113/98; 50026/99; 3991/00
COUNSEL : Mr L Foster SC, A Paterson (Plaintiff) Ms K Williams (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Sarvaas Ciappara (Plaintiff) Freehills (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
Einstein J
Tuesday 14 November 2006
50113/98 Idoport Pty Limited v National Australia Bank Limited & Ors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate