NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 166 A Crim R 28
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina v Darwiche & Ors [2006] NSWSC 924
HEARING DATE(S) : 9/3/06,13/3/06, 14/3/06, 15/3/06, 16/3/06,20/3/06, 21/3/06, 24/3/06, 27/3/06, 28/3/06, 29/3/06, 30/3/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 19 April 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1
DECISION : Picture identification evidence, and evidence concerning the creation of the com-fit image and the image are admitted.
CATCHWORDS : Picture identification evidence - Com-Fit images
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Sentences (Administration) Act 1999
Festa v R (2001) 208 CLR 593 Graham v R (1998) 195 CLR 606 Papakosmas v R (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v Barbaro [2000] NSWCCA 192; (2000) 112 A Crim R 551 CASES CITED : R v BD (1997) 94 A Crim R 131 R v Cook [1959] 2 QB 340 R v Lockyer (1996) 89 A Crim R 457 R v McKellar [2000] NSWCCA 523 R v Sparkes (1996) 6 Tas R 178
Regina PARTIES : Adnan Darwiche (Accused) Nasaem El-Zeyat (Accused) Ramzi Aouad (Accused)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2005/992; 2005/1252; 2005/993; 2005/997
LLoyd Babb / John Pickering (Crown) COUNSEL : Angus Webb / Craig Smith (Adnan Darwiche) Gregory Stanton (El-Zeyat) Phillip Segal (Aouad)
S Kavanagh (Crown) SOLICITORS : Mark Klees & Associates (Adnan Darwiche) Theo Voros (El-Zeyat) John Krajcik (Aouad)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION BELL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate