NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 60 ACSR 646 206 FLR 254
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : White v Shortall [2006] NSWSC 1379
HEARING DATE(S) : 24/10/06; 3/11/06; 7/11/06; 8/11/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 December 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
DECISION : Judgment for the plaintiff for $548,452. Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs.
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE – admissibility and weight of evidence concerning what the person giving evidence would have done in a certain hypothetical situation TRUSTS – certainty of subject matter – whether possible to have trust of a certain number of shares out of a larger parcel of shares - CORPORATIONS – nature of rights comprised in a share – whether the choses in action connected with company shares must be identified on a share by share basis – significance of individual numbering of shares – TRUSTS - equitable compensation for breach of trust – to whom payable – principles by which calculated – TRUSTS – whether contractual agreement not to dispose of any interest in shares makes it impossible to declare a trust of those shares – whether possibility of court orders to enforce restrictions on restricted securities (within meaning of ASX Listing Rules) makes it impossible to hold such securities on trust - effect of various restrictions on "restricted securities" (within meaning of ASX Listing Rules) on remedies for breach of trust concerning those securities – TAXATION – capital gains tax – operation of capital gains tax when trust is declared of some of a larger holding of shares – TRUSTS – whether the intention necessary to create a trust is objective or subjective – CONTRACT – whether the intention necessary to enter contractual relations is objective or subjective – CONTRACT – when provisions as to time are of the essence – CONTRACT – measure of damages for breach – EVIDENCE – burden of proof – of payment being a loan – SUCCESSION – EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS – specific legacy of a certain number of shares from a larger holding – operation of executor's assent – TRUSTS – of part of a debt – EVIDENCE – significance of a litigant giving evidence very important for her case only late in the development of the case – EQUITY – whether fiduciary duty owed by a wealthier de facto partner to a less wealthy de facto partner
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate