NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 68 IPR 577
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Artedomus v Del Casale [2006] NSWSC 146
HEARING DATE(S) : 5,6,7,8,14,15 Sept 2005 (written submissions received subsequently between 27 Sept & 17 October 2005)
JUDGMENT DATE : 13 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Burchett AJ at one
DECISION : Judgment for the Plaintiff on liability
CATCHWORDS : Confidential information - meaning of requirement that the information have "the necessary quality of confidence about it" - whether the secrecy of the information must be absolute or may be merely relative so that what is "not generally known" may be a trade secret or confidential information - relevance of "the usage and practices of the particular industry or trade" - effect of the decision in Wright v Gasweld Pty Ltd --- - confidentiality of information as to the source and suppliers in Italy of a particular stone found in a remote and little known area of Sicily - agreement in restraint of trade - whether related to employment only or also to goodwill involved in a sale of shares - effect of involvement of goodwill - construction of expression "commercially sensitive information " by reference to the practice in the industry concerned - whether a company was used as a cloak to enable a covenantor to avoid the effect of his personal obligation --- principles of construction of agreements in restraint of trade --- prevention of the use of confidential information as a "springboard" - duties of directors and employees of a company, whether currently or formerly so, with respect to information under s. 183 of the Corporations Act 2001.
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 Restraints of Trade Act 1976.
Gilford Motor Company, Limited v Horne [1933] I Ch 935; Scheckter v Kolbe [1955] 3 S.Af.LR 109; H & R Block Ltd v Sanott [1976] 1 NZLR 213; Hawker de Havilland Ltd v Fernandes (1996) ATPR 41-479 at 41,905-41,906; Clarke v Newland [1991] 1 All ER 397 at 402; Ansell Rubber Co Pty Ltd v Allied Rubber Industries Pty Ltd [1967] VR 37; Industrial Rollformers Pty Ltd v Ingersoll-Rand (Australia) Ltd [2001] NSWCA 111 at [182] – [191]; R Dean on The Law of Trade Secrets and Personal Secrets 2nd Edition (2002) at 67; R Ricketson and C. Creswell on The Law of Intellectual Property: Copyright, Designs & Confidential Information Volume 2 section 25.85, 25.0; CASES CITED : Vulcan Detinning Co v Assmann (1918) 173 NY Supp. 334 ; Thomas Marshall (Exports) Ltd v Guinle [1979] Ch 227 at 248; Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] 1 AC 688, 705; International Scientific Communications Inc v Pattison [1979] FSR 429 at 434; Maggbury Pty Limited v Hafele Australia Pty Limited (2001) 210 CLR 181 at 197; Wright v Gasweld Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 317 ; Coco v A. N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41 at 47; T.W. Cronin Shoe Pty Ltd v Cronin [1929] VLR 244; Butt v Long (1953) 88 CLR 476; Cream v Bushcolt Pty Ltd [2004] WASCA 82 at [21] - [24]; R.P. Austin H.A.J. Ford and I.M.Ramsay on Company Directors Principles of Law and Corporate Governance (2005) sections 9.19 – 9.24;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate