NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Mark THOMPSON v Walter DAL CIN & ANOR [2006] NSWSC 1249
HEARING DATE(S) : 21/11/2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 November 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Malpass
DECISION : The notice of motion is dismised. The defendants are to pay the costs of the notice of motion.
CATCHWORDS : Dispute involving neighbours - review - Registrar - nature of the application - need to make out a ground of appeal that justifies the disturbing of the decision - attempted reliance upon material not before the Registrar - direction to exchange witness statements - discretion - relevant considerations and questions of practice and procedure
Civil Procedure Act 2005 NSW LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 NSW Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW
CASES CITED : Borowiak v Hobbs & 1 Ors [2006] NSWSC 1089 Hall & 1 Ors v Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation [2006] NSWSC 1076
Mark THOMPSON PARTIES : Walter DAL CIN Luigina DAL CIN
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20235/05
COUNSEL : Mr R. Killalea (Pl) Mr L. Ellison SC (Defs)
SOLICITORS : AWM Dickinson & Son (Pl) Hunter Lawyers (Defs)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 20235/05
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Assistant Registrar Howe
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION : 27/07/06
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION : Mark Thompson v Walter Dal Cin & Anor
- 7 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE MALPASS
24 November 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate