NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: REGINA v MISKI [2006] NSWCCA 178 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 1 May 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 June 2006
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Hall J at 65; Latham J at 66
DECISION: 1. Crown appeal allowed; 2. Sentences quashed and resentence as follows; Count 1 - A non-parole period of four years to commence on 18 February 2005 and expire on 17 February 2009 and a balance of term of 1 year and 4 months to expire on 17 June 2010; Count 2 - Taking into account the matter on the Form 1 a non-parole period of 4 years to commence 18 November 2005 and expire on 17 November 2009 and a balance of term of 1 year and 6 months to expire on 17 May 2011; Count 3 - A non-parole period of 4 years to commence on 18 February 2006 and expire on 17 February 2010 and a balance of term of 1 year and 4 months to expire on 17 June 2011; Count 4 - A non-parole period of 3 years and 9 months to commence on 18 August 2006 and expire on 17 May 2010 and a balance of term of 1 year and 9 months to expire on 17 February 2012; The total non-parole period is 5 years and 3 months and the balance of the term is 1 year and 9 months.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal – robbery in company – offensive weapon – post-offending conduct – whether overall sentence adequately reflects criminality – criminal record – offences committed while on parole – appropriate sentence for multiple offences – distinguished from Henry guideline – offences on the Form One – whether temporal and causal connection between offences – delay in bringing Crown appeal – whether residual discretion should be exercised – specific and general deterrence
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate