NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: LYNCH v R [2007] NSWCCA 268
HEARING DATE(S): 8 August 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 4 September 2007
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Howie J at 21; Harrison J at 22
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted; 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal against sentence – assault, malicious damage to property and use of offensive instrument – application to tender medical evidence not before sentencing court – reports available at the time of sentence hearing and reports not available – whether evidence should be received – whether counsel failed to seek evidence now available
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
CASES CITED: R v Deng [2007] NSWCCA 216
PARTIES: David Brian Lynch (Appl) The Crown
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/3219
COUNSEL: I Todd (Appl) N Adams (Crown)
SOLICITORS: AKN & Associates (Appl) Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/41/0049
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Garling DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 1 August 2006
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2007/3219
McCLELLAN CJ at CL HOWIE J HARRISON J
TUESDAY 4 SEPTEMBER 2007 LYNCH, David v R Judgment 1 McCLELLAN CJ at CL: The applicant pleaded guilty to three charges as follows: · On 9 September 2004 at Sussex Inlet in the State of New South Wales did assault Shane Botterill. · On 9 September 2004 at Sussex Inlet in the State of New South Wales did maliciously damage property, namely, the dwelling house at 14 Glanville Road. · On 9 September 2004 at Sussex Inlet in the State of New South Wales did use an offensive instrument, namely a motor vehicle, with intent to commit a serious indictable offence, namely intimidation. 2 The first charge was an offence contrary to s 61 of the Crimes Act and carries a maximum penalty of 2 years imprisonment. The second charge was an offence contrary to s 195(1)(a) of the Crimes Act for which the maximum penalty was 5 years imprisonment. The third charge was an offence contrary to s 33B of the Crimes Act for which the maximum penalty is 12 years imprisonment. 3 In relation to the third charge an offence of breach of an apprehended violence order was included on a Form 1 and taken into account by the sentencing judge. 4 In relation to each of counts 1 and 2 the applicant was sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of 9 months the sentences to be served concurrently. The sentencing judge declined to set a non-parole period because of the more lengthy sentence imposed in relation to count 3. In relation to that count the applicant was sentenced to a non-parole period of 1 year and 3 months with a total term of 2 years and 6 months imprisonment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate