NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Galaxidis v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 154
HEARING DATE(S): 21/04/06
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 May 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; James J at 2; Hoeben J at 54
DECISION: Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – SENTENCE – guilty pleas - dishonestly obtaining by deception a financial advantage – supply prohibited drug – whether sentence was excessive
Crimes Act LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act
Johnson v The Queen (2004) 78 ALJR 616 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 CASES CITED: Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Hovan [2005] NSWCCA 179 R v Thomson, R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Weldon: R v Carberry (2002) 136 A Crim R 55
PARTIES: John Galaxidis v Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/2152 CCAP
COUNSEL: P Lowe - Applicant G Rowling - Respondent
SOLICITORS: D Leamey - Applicant S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 03/41/0237
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Phelan DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 17/03/2005
IN THE supreme COURT OF new south wales court of CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/2152 CCAP
HODGSON JA JAMES J HOEBEN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate