NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: O'Connell v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 82
HEARING DATE(S): 8 February 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Simpson J at 81; Rothman J at 82
DECISION: APPEAL DISMISSED
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - SENTENCE - MURDER - SERIOUSNESS OF CONDUCT PUTTING OFFENCE INTO WORST CATEGORY - LIFE SENTENCE APPROPRIATE BUT FOR YOUTH OF OFFENDER AND PLEA OF GUILTY - ERRORS BY SENTENCING JUDGE - SETTING NON PAROLE PERIOD AND INDEPENDENTLY SETTING BALANCE TERM LONGER THAN EQUIVALENT OF ONE THIRD OF THAT PERIOD - TAKING INTO ACCOUNT PROSECUTION EXPENDITURE OF TIME AND EFFORT WHEN ASSESSING DISCOUNT FOR EARLY PLEA OF GUILTY - WHETHER LESS SEVERE SENTENCE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PASSED
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912
Bugmy v The Queen 1990 169 CLR 525 R v Castles 2005 152 A Crim R 277 R v Dennis [2003] NSWCCA 137 R v Engert 1996 84 A Crim R 67 R v Franklin [2005] NSWCCA 24 R v GDR (1994) 35 NSWLR 376 R v Hampton (1998) 44 NSLWR 729 R v Hearne 2001 124 A Crim R 45 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 CASES CITED: R v Lynn [2004] NSWCCA 22 R v Moffitt (1990) 20 NSWLR 114 R v P [2004] NSWCCA 218 R v Pham 1999 55 A Crim R 128 R v Scoglnamglio 1991 56 A Crim R 81 R v Scott [2005] NSWCCA 286 R v SDM (2001) 51 NSWLR 530 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Slater 2001 121 A Crim R 369 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate