NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bishop v White & anor in the Estate of White; Bishop v White [2006] NSWSC 354
HEARING DATE(S) : 24 and 26 April 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 27 April 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
DECISION : Provision for daughter varied requiring trustees to purchase house for daughter to occupy during her life if requested. No provision made for grandson
CATCHWORDS : FAMILY PROVISION ACT - claims by daughter and grandson - daughter given life estate in half of residue under will - whether absolute gift sufficient to enable home to be bought should be made - grandson suffers from schizophrenia - accommodation provided by his mother - whether provision for separate accommodation or continuing accommodation after death of his mother should be made
LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982
CASES CITED : Dijkhuijs (formerly Coney) v Barclay (1988) 13 NSWLR 639 Re Fulop deceased (1987) 8 NSWLR 679
Cyrus Anthony Guy Bishop (Plaintiff in 6687/04) PARTIES : Joanne Mary Bishop (Plaintiff in 4031/04) Anthony Alan White (First Defendant in both matters) Huw David Evans (Second Defendant in both matters)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 6687 of 2004; 4031 of 2004
Ms K Thompson (Cyrus Bishop) COUNSEL : Mr D Maddox (Joanne Bishop) Mr P J Livingstone (Defendants)
Ferns Aubrey Mitchell (Cyrus Bishop) SOLICITORS : Hal Ginges & Co (Joanne Bishop) Lane & Lane (Defendants)
- 4 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
WINDEYER J
THURSDAY 27 APRIL 2006.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate