NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Jones & Ors (No4) [2007] NSWSC 1154
JUDGMENT DATE : 4 April 2007
JUDGMENT OF : Buddin J
DECISION : Objection upheld.
CATCHWORDS : Objection to parts of lawfully intercepted telephone conversations
CASES CITED : R v Blick (2000) 111 A Crim R 326
PARTIES : Regina Adam Jones
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2006/2009
COUNSEL : J Pickering (Crown) D Price (Adam Jones) (Accused)
SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Director of Public Prosecutions) Conaghan Hunter P/L (Adam Jones)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
BUDDIN J
4 April 2007
2006/2009 - Regina v Adam JONES 2006/2010 - Regina v Samuel JONES 2006/2011 - Regina v Elizabeth Jean JONES 2006/2012 - Regina v Lydia JONES 2006/2007 - Regina v Adam Samuel JONES
JUDGMENT - (No 4) Objection to parts of recorded conversations between Ellen Smith and Adam Jones on 20 October 2005
1 His Honour: I have previously overruled an objection made on behalf of the accused Adam Jones Jnr concerning the admissibility of two phone conversations (between him and his wife, Ellen Smith) which were recorded by way of a listening device. I have been informed that in consequence of that ruling, counsel for Adam Jones Jnr and the Crown have agreed to edit out two separate portions of those conversations. They cannot however agree about one other aspect of the conversation which accordingly falls to me to determine.
2 The part of the conversation which is in dispute is in the following terms: "Ellen Smith: You'll have a hard job to do anything because if the gavvers get hold of you, you're going down for a very long time.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate