NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: NT v Regina Non-publication order [2007] NSWCCA 143
HEARING DATE(S): 24 April 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 24 May 2007
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Rothman J at 2; Harrison J at 7
DECISION: Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal against sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - five counts aggravated indecent assault, two counts aggravated sexual assault, one count attempted aggravated sexual assault - offender step father of victim - victim 10 and 11 years of age at time of offences - whether overall sentence manifestly excessive taking into account applicant's early plea of guilty - whether sentencing outcome sufficiently reflective of the finding of exceptional features identified by sentencing judge
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 - ss 61(M)(1), 61(J)(1), Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - ss 21A(1), (2) & (3)
Pearce v The Queen (1988) 194 CLR 610 R v AD [2005] NSWCCA 208 R v BJW (2000) 112 A Crim R 1 R v Dent (Court of Criminal Appeal, 14 March 1991, unreported) R v Doherty [2006] NSWCCA 133 R v Doolan [2006] NSWCCA 29 R v Kennedy [2000] NSWCCA 527 CASES CITED: R v Hopkins [2004] NSWCCA 105 R v Reyes [2005] NSWCCA 218 R v Sangalang [2005] NSWCCA 171 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Slack [2004] NSWCCA 128 R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v TV [2006] NSWCCA 174 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168
PARTIES: NT (Applicant) Regina (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate