NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: RLT v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 357 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 28 September 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 November 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Sully J at 1; Adams J at 88; Hall J at 106
DECISION: Appeal against conviction allowed; Conviction quashed and ; (by majority, Adams J dissenting) that there be a new trial of the appellant
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995
M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 McKnoulty v Reg (1994) 77 A Crim R 333 King v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 423 CASES CITED: Reid v The Queen [1980] AC 343 Reg v MNZ [2005] NSWCCA 278 Winningham v The Queen (1995) 69 ALJR 775 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620 MWJ v The Queen [2005] HCA 74
PARTIES: RLT Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/1446
COUNSEL: P. Miller - Crown P. Hamill SC/A. Williams - Appellant
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh - Crown S. O'Connor - Appellant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 03/21/3123
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Maguire DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 17 June 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/1446
SULLY J ADAMS J HALL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate