NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Budd v Director, Attorney Generals Department [2006] NSWSC 1267
HEARING DATE(S) : 16/11/06 JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/17/2006
DECISION : The appeal is dismissed. In addition to dismissing the summons filed on 21 February 2006, the summons filed on 11 May 2006 is dismissed, to the extent that it purports to be filed in these proceedings ; The Plaintiff is to pay the Defendant's costs of the proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : Exclusion of conduct involving the holder of an office relating to a court exercising the court's judicial functions from the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Freedom of Information Act 1989 LEGISLATION CITED : Local Court (Criminal and Applications Procedure) Rule 2003 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Housing Commission (New South Wales) v Tamar Pastoral Co (1983) 3 NSWLR 378 John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited v Ryde Local Court [2005] NSW CA 101, 62 NSWLR 512 N(2) v Director General, Attorney General's Department [2002] NSW ADT 33 CASES CITED : NZ Director General, Attorney General's Department (GD) [2005] NSW ADT AP 62 Our Town FM Pty Limited v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1987) 16 FCR 465 Soulemezis v Dudley Holdings (Pty Limited) (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Tooheys Limited v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) (1961) 105 CLR 602
PARTIES : Pamela Joan Budd (Appellant) Director, Attorney Generals Department (Respondent))
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate