NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Finnie v Regina and Regina v Finnie [2007] NSWCCA 38
HEARING DATE(S): 26 September 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 February 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Sully J at 1; Simpson J at 79; Latham J at 80
DECISION: Appellant granted extension of time necessary to permit of prosecution of appeal against conviction and application for leave to appeal against sentence; Appeal against conviction dismissed; Leave granted to appeal against sentence; Appeal against sentence dismissed; Crown appeal against sentence dismissed
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure Act) 1999 (NSW)
The Queen v Chai (2002) 128 A Crim R 101 R v Gulliford (2004) 148 A Crim R 558 CASES CITED: Karageorge (1998) 103 A Crim R 157 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606 MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348 Reg v Hallocoglu (1992) 26 NSWLR 67
PARTIES: Sydney Thomas Finnie Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/1629; 2006/1704
COUNSEL: J. A. Girdham - Crown R. F. Sutherland SC - Appellant
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh - Crown Brock Partners - Appellant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/11/0411
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Murrell DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 4 May 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/1629 2006/1704
SULLY J SIMPSON J LATHAM J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate