NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : (1) B.J. Burke v Powell - Estate of M F Burke (2) I.W. Burke v Powell - Estate of M F Burke (3) Morris v Powell - Estate of M F Burke [2006] NSWSC 108
HEARING DATE(S) : 14/02/06, 15/02/06, 16/02/06, 17/02/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 7 March 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Legacy to each plaintiff: see paragraph [53]
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION - family provision - claims by four adult children - whether each left without adequate provision - competing claim of fifth adult child to whom deceased's house devised - house only asset of estate - deceased's expressed wish to reward fifth child - relationships of the four plaintiffs and fifth child to deceased
LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982
CASES CITED : Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 213 ALR 692
(1) Brian Joseph Burke - Plaintiff Melva Maree Powell - First Defendant Robin Mason - Second Defendant (2) Ian Wayne Burke - Plaintiff PARTIES : Melva Maree Powell - First Defendant Robin Mason - Second Defendant (3) Raylene Morris - First Plaintiff Spencer Burke - Second Plaintiff Melva Maree Powell - First Defendant Robin Mason - Second Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC (1) 6288/03; (2) 2253/04; (3) 3773/04
COUNSEL : Mrs M.T. Bridger - Plaintiffs Mr A.L. Hill - Defendants
(1) Baker Love - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : (2) O'Hearn & Bilinsky - Plaintiff (3) Bilbie Dan - Plaintiffs Armstrongs - Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate