NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Reale v Duncan Reale; Duncan Reale v Cameda Investments [2006] NSWSC 227
HEARING DATE(S) : 20 March 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 3 April 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
DECISION : Application for transfer of the proceedings to the Family Court of Australia denied; directions for the purpose of resolving the remaining issues in the proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - transfer of proceedings under Corporations legislation from Supreme Court to Family Court of Australia - proceedings substantially resolved, except for costs - relevant considerations - no issue of general principle.
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 1337C, 1337H LEGISLATION CITED : Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 117 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Cth), s 5
In Marriage of Bishop (2003) 175 FLR 10 CASES CITED : In Marriage of Warby (2001) 166 FLR 319 Lambert v Dean (1989) 97 FLR 352 TAJ Productions Pty Ltd v White (2005) 56 ACSR 114
1190/05 Maria-Rita Reale (P) Duncan Reale Pty Ltd (D1) PARTIES : Anthony Alan Duncan (D2) 1518/05 Duncan Reale Pty Ltd (P) Cameda Investments Pty Ltd (D1) Anthony Alan Duncan (D2)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1190/05; 1518/05
COUNSEL : TGR Parker with P Castley (P) A Harding (D)
Minerva Technology Lawyers (P) SOLICITORS : No appearance (D1) Maunsell Pennington Solicitors (D2)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate