NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Tisdale & Ors v Ballanday Pty Ltd & Ors [2006] NSWSC 909
HEARING DATE(S) : 4 and 5 September 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 6 September 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J
DECISION : Interlocutory injunction granted.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS – DIRECTORS – REMOVAL – INJUNCTIONS – whether interlocutory injunction should be granted restraining a joint shareholder from exercising rights to vote at shareholders meeting to remove a director – rights to vote as between joint shareholders considered – balance of convenience.
LEGISLATION CITED : Companies Act 1961 – s.144 (2) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – s.140(1)
- Barclays Bank Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1959] 3 All ER 140 - Burns v Siemens Brothers Dynamo Works Ltd [1919] 1 Ch 225 - Commissioner of Land Tax v Truscott [1983] 1 NSWLR 406 - Dawson v Dawson [1945] VLR 99 CASES CITED : - John v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 11 ACLR 75 - Hopkins Professional Services Pty Ltd v Foyster Holdings Pty Ltd (2001) 39 ACSR 519 - Pettaras v Pettaras [2004] NSWSC 1212 - T.H. Saunders & Co Ltd, In re [1908] 1 Ch 415 - Sky v Brody (1970) 92 WN(NSW) 934 - Tang v Bongreen Pty Ltd (2003) 47 ACSR 400
Terrance Roland Tisdale – First Plaintiff T&M Industries Pty Ltd – Second Plaintiff T&M Constructions Pty Ltd – Third Plaintiff PARTIES : T&M Group Engineering Pty Ltd – Fourth Plaintiff Ballanday Pty Ltd – First Defendant Christopher Paul Maley – Second Defendant Louise Barbara Marie Maley – Third Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate