NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Tennant v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 208
HEARING DATE(S): 24 May 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 July 2006
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; James J at 2; Hoeben J at 64
DECISION: Appeal against conviction dismissed
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - counsels' addresses - defence counsel addressing first - separation of jury during retirement - no miscarriage of justice
LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act Jury Act
CASES CITED: R v Locchi (1991) 22 NSWLR 309
PARTIES: Donna Maree Tennant Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/80
COUNSEL: P. E. Barrett - Crown R. Cavanagh - Appellant
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh - Crown Nicholas Moier & Assoc. - Appellant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 03/11/0528
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Berman DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 10 February 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/80 CCAP
McCLELLAN CJ at CL JAMES J HOEBEN J
10 July 2006 Donna Maree TENNANT v REGINA Judgment 1 McCLELLAN CJ at CL I agree with James J. 2 JAMES J: Donna Maree Tennant appealed against her conviction after a trial in the District Court, on a charge that between 1 July 1999 and 24 September 2001 she knowingly took part in the supply of not less than a large commercial quantity of a prohibited drug, methylamphetamine, an offence under s 25(2) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act. She did not apply for leave to appeal against the sentence of imprisonment which was imposed on her, following her conviction.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate