REGINA v. JUNG [2006] NSWSC 658

New South Wales Supreme Court

CITATION : REGINA v. JUNG [2006] NSWSC 658

HEARING DATE(S) : 19 - 23 June 2006; 26 - 28 June 2006

JUDGMENT DATE : 29 June 2006

JURISDICTION : Criminal

JUDGMENT OF : Hall J at 1

DECISION : The opinion evidence of Dr. Sutisno is admissible

CATCHWORDS : Admissibility of expert opinion evidence

LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 Evidence Act 1995

R v Tang [2006] NsWCCA 167 R v BLM (Blanch, CJ. unreported 14 September 2005) R v Gilmore (1977) 2 NSWLR 935 Makita (Australia) Pty. Limited v. Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 R v Murdoch (No. 4) [2005] NTSC 78 R v McHardie & Danielson (1983) 2 NSWLR 733 Harrington-Smith v Western Australia (No. 7) (2003) 130 FCR 424 R v Smith (2001) 206 CLR 650 McNeil v. Commissioner of Taxation (2003) 202 ALR 35 Murphy v The Queen (1994) 62 SASR 121 Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 Idoport Pty Limited v National Australia Bank Limited [1999] NSWSC 828 CASES CITED : Adler v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2003] NSWCA 131 Davie v Lord Provost, Magistrates and Counsellors of the City of Edinburgh (1953) SC 34 Bell v FC & U Industrial Benefit Society Limited (McLelland, J., unreported 9 September 1987) Lewis v The Queen (1987) 88 FLR 105 Trade Practices Commission v. Arnott's Limited (No. 5) (1990) 21 FCR 324 Pollock v. Wellington (1996) 15 WAR 1 HG v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 415 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 75 ALJR 992 R v Cook [2004] NSWCCA 52 R v Shamouil [2006] NSWCCA 112 R v Blick (2002) 111 A. Crim. R. 326 R v Yates [2002] NSWCCA 520 R v Lissoff [1999] NSWCCA 364