NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Equity 8 Pty Ltd v Shaw Stockbroking Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1251
HEARING DATE(S) : 20/11/06, 21/11/06
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 November 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/21/2006
DECISION : Paragraphs admitted
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - relevance - expression of opinion by market participant about market practice - where pleading particularises allegation of market practice by reference to statutory analogies - opinion evidence - where witness not retained as expert - compliance with rule 31 not required
Conveyancing Act 1919, ss.85(1)(d), 129 LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995, s.79 Retail Leases Act 1999, s.44(1)(b) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Divisions 1 and 2 of Part 31
CASES CITED : Con-Stan Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Norwich Winterthur Insurance (Aust) Pty Ltd (1985) 160 CLR 226 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705
PARTIES : Equity 8 Pty Limited - Plaintiff Shaw Stockbroking Limited - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2963/05
COUNSEL : Mr B.R. McClintock SC/Ms T.L. Wong - Plaintiff Mr D.J. Hammerschlag SC/Mr D.R. Stack - Defendant
SOLICITORS : Gilbert + Tobin - Plaintiff Surry Partners - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BARRETT J
TUESDAY 21 NOVEMBER 2006
2963/05 - EQUITY 8 PTY LIMITED v SHAW STOCKBROKING LIMITED AND ANOR
JUDGMENT (On objection to paragraphs 15 and 16 of affidavit of Bruce John Wookey sworn 20/08/05; see p 50)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate