NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 160 A Crim R 151
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: WILLIAMS, Daniel Lee v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 26
HEARING DATE(S): 23 January 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 February 2006
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Howie J at 69; Latham J at 70
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm with intent - kidnapping and attempted kidnapping - directions to jury - claim of right - fact of an acquittal on one count in considering verdicts on others - unreasonable verdicts on the evidence - regard to be had to jury's benefit in seeing and hearing witnesses at trial
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 R v Fuge (2001) 123 A Crim R 310 CASES CITED: R v John Tinkler (1859) 1F.4F.513; 175 ER 832 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82 Walden v Hensler (1987) 163 CLR 561
PARTIES: Daniel Lee Williams (Appl) The Crown
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/2197
COUNSEL: G Rowling (Crown) P Byrne SC (Appl)
SOLICITORS: Legal Aid Commission of NSW (Appl) Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 02/31/0280
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Nader ADCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/2197
McCLELLAN CJ at CL HOWIE J LATHAM J
FRIDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2006 WILLIAMS, Daniel Lee v REGINA Judgment 1 McCLELLAN CJ at CL: The appellant was indicted upon four counts as follows:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate