NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Vickovic [2006] NSWCCA 231
HEARING DATE(S): 21 June 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 3 August 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Grove J at 2; Hidden J at 58
DECISION: CROWN APPEAL DISMISSED
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - DRUG COURT - CROWN APPEAL AGAINST FINAL SENTENCE - RESPONDENT "GOLD MEDAL" GRADUATE FROM DRUG COURT PROGRAMME - NON CUSTODIAL IMPOSITIONS - SUCH IMPOSITIONS NOT MANDATORY BUT NO MISCARRIAGE OF SENTENCING DISCRETION IN SO ORDERING - DISCUSSION CONCERNING APPEALS FROM DRUG COURT
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Court Act 1998
Everett v The Queen 1994 181 CLR 295 Griffiths v The Queen 1977 137 CLR 293 Malvaso v The Queen 1989 168 CLR 227 CASES CITED: R v Ohar 2004 59 NSWLR 596 R v Sheedy, unreported, Drug Court, 17 February 2003 R v Toman [2004] NSWCCA 31 R v Trindall 2002 133 A Crim R 119
PARTIES: Regina v Tommy Vickovic
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/2132
COUNSEL: P. Ingram (Crown/Appellant) G. Bashir with M. Moody (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: S. Kavanagh (DPP) S. O'Connor (Legal Aid)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Drug Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2004/107
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Judge Barnett
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 24/01/05 12/09/05
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: N/A
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/2132
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate