NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Buffrey v Buffrey & Anor [2006] NSWSC 1349 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 1 December 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 6 December 2006
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J
DECISION : Declaration and order as sought in Statement of Claim.
CATCHWORDS : RESULTING TRUSTS – PRESUMPTION OF ADVANCEMENT – Competition between presumptions – principles summarised – whether facts rebutted presumption of resulting trust – whether facts rebutted presumption of advancement.
- Brown v Brown (1993) 31 NSWLR 582 - Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242 - Cummins (a bankrupt), Trustees of the Property of, v Cummins (2006) 80 ALJR 589 - Currie v Hamilton [1984] 1 NSWLR 687 - Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886 CASES CITED : - Charles Marshall Pty Ltd v Grimsley (1956) 95 CLR 353 - Martin v Martin (1959) 110 CLR 297 - Neilson v Letch (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 254 - Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538 - Ryan v Dries [2002] NSWCA 3 - Shephard v Cartwright [1955] AC 431 - Thompson Haulage Pty Ltd v Leigh [2006] NSWSC 540
William Kenneth Buffrey – Plaintiff PARTIES : Janice Annette Buffrey – First Defendant ORIX Australia Corporation Limited – Second Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3332/06
COUNSEL : M.W. Sneddon – Plaintiff T.S. Hale SC, J.K. Chippindall – Second Defendant
Stuart J. Latham – Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Tsolakis Solicitors – First Defendant – Submitting appearance M.D. Nikolaidis & Co – Second Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate