NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Valentine v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 23
HEARING DATE(S): 1 February 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 12 February 2007
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Simpson J at 2; Price J at 3
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law-sentencing-voluntary disclosure of offences-imminence of discovery-degree of leniency
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 300 (2)
R v Bell [2005] NSWCCA 81 CASES CITED: R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 R v Palinko [2005] NSWCCA 46 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267
PARTIES: Darrin Patrick Valentine Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/2341
COUNSEL: P Barrett - Crown J Manuell - Applicant
SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh - Crown S O'Connor - Applicant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/31/0140
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: McLoughlin DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 3 February 2006
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: Regina v Darrin Patrick Valentine
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/2341
McClellan CJ at CL Simpson J Price J
12 February 2007 DARRIN PATRICK VALENTINE v REGINA
Judgment
1 McCLELLAN CJ at CL: I agree with Price J. 2 SIMPSON J: I agree with Price J. 3 PRICE J: The applicant Darrin Patrick Valentine seeks leave to appeal against the severity of sentences imposed upon him by McLoughlin DCJ in the District Court at Gosford on 3 February 2006. 4 On 19 May 2005, the applicant pleaded guilty in the Local Court to three counts of using a false instrument with intent contrary to s 300(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) and confirmed his pleas in the District Court. 5 An offence contrary to s 300(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment of ten years. 6 Two matters on a Form 1 of using a false instrument with intent were taken into account on sentence. 7 The Judge (taking into account the matters on the Form 1) on the first count sentenced the applicant to imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years commencing on 3 November 2006 and expiring on 2 November 2008 with a balance of term of two years expiring on 2 November 2010. On the second count, a sentence of imprisonment with a non-parole period of eighteen months commencing on 3 February 2006 and expiring on 2 August 2007, with a balance of term of eighteen months expiring on 2 February 2009 was imposed. On the third count the applicant was sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of eighteen months commencing on 3 May 2007 and expiring on 2 November 2008, with a balance of term of 18 months expiring on 2 May 2010. 8 As a result of partial accumulation, the total effective sentence was imprisonment for four years and nine months, with a non-parole period of two years and nine months.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate