NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Collins v R [2006] NSWCCA 162
HEARING DATE(S): 10 March 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 May 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Simpson J at 2; Johnson J at 86
DECISION: (i) appeal against conviction dismissed; (ii) leave granted to appeal against sentence; (iii) appeal against sentence allowed to the extent only that the sentence of imprisonment for eight years with a non-parole period of five years to commence on 16 February 2005 be set aside. The appellant re-sentenced to a period of imprisonment for eight years, commencing on 8 October 2004 and expiring on 7 October 2012, with a non-parole period of five years, expiring on 7 October 2009.
CATCHWORDS: appeal against conviction - application for leave to appeal against sentence - aggravated armed robbery with wounding - conflicting accounts given by complainant - leave granted to Crown Prosecutor to cross-examine complainant - directions to jury with respect to evidence of identification - complainant and complainant's husband known to appellant - complainant's husband pleaded guilty to charge of accessory after fact of armed robbery of his wife - complainant's out of court representations at variance with trial identification evidence - directions to jury - unreliable evidence - descriptive evidence - warning not required - warning not prohibited - no error in directions to jury - directions adequate - whether verdict unreasonable - appellant's prior criminal record - offence committed whilst on conditional liberty - victim vulnerable - planned criminal activity - whether appellant knew of victim's vulnerability - pre-trial period in custody - sentence to reflect pre-trial period in custody
Crimes Act 1900 s96 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s9, s12, s21A Evidence Act 1995 s38, s116, s165
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate