NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Irving v The Commonwealth of Australia [2006] NSWSC 958
HEARING DATE(S) : 12-13 September 2006.
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 September 2006
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Studdert J
DECISION : (1) Order that the limitation period be extended until 9 February 2000. (2) Costs of the application are to be costs in the cause.
LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act, ss 60G, 60I
Blunden v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 73 Blyth v Commonwealth of Australia [2005] NSWSC 721 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996-1997) 186 CLR 541 Commonwealth of Australia v Diston [2003] NSWCA 51 CASES CITED : Commonwealth of Australia v Shaw [2006] NSWCA 209 Commonwealth of Australia v Smith [2005] NSWCA 478 CRA Limited v Martignago (1995) 39 NSWLR 13 Harris v Commercial Minerals Limited (1996) 186 CLR 1 Holt v Wynter (2000) 49 NSWLR 128 Telstra Corporation v Rea [2002] NSWCA 49
PARTIES : Maxwell David Irving (Plaintiff) The Commonwealth of Australia (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20045/00
COUNSEL : A.G. Melick SC (Plaintiff) C. Barry QC/D. Brogan (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Sachs Gerace Lawyers (Plaintiff) Australian Government Solicitor (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
STUDDERT J
Thursday 21 September 2006
20045/00 MAXWELL DAVID IRVING v THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate