NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 169 A CRIM R 280
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Wilmot v R [2007] NSWCCA 30 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 9/2/07
JUDGMENT DATE: 1 March 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Sully J at 1; Bell J at 2; Buddin J at 51
DECISION: 1. Grant leave to appeal; 2. Dismiss the appeal
CATCHWORDS: Sentence - serious offences of violence - protection of the community - non-parole period in excess of statutory proportion
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Regulation 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Evidence Act 1995
Elyard v R [2006] NSWCCA 43 Markarian v Regina [2005] NSWCCA 264; (2005) 79 ALJR 1048 Mill v R (1988) 166 CLR 59 CASES CITED: Power v R (1973) 131 CLR 623 R v Rowe (1996) 89 A Crim R 467 R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Veen (No. 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465
PARTIES: Wayne Lindsay Wilmot (Applicant) Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/2277
COUNSEL: DT Spears (Applicant) J Girdham (Crown)
SOLICITORS: Patricia White (Applicant) S Kavanagh (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/21/0187
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Marien DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2006/2277 CCAP
SULLY J BELL J BUDDIN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate