NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : CDM v Roth [2006] NSWSC 847
HEARING DATE(S) : 15 August 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 August 2006
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Harrison
DECISION : (1) The decision of Her Honour Magistrate Corbett dated 17 February 2006 is affirmed; (2) The summons dated 11 March 2006 is dismissed; (3) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal decision of Local Court Magistrate - deed
Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Procession Act 2004 (NSW) Local Courts Act 1982 (NSW) - s 73
Allen v Kerr & Anor (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-354 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Carr v Neill [1999] NSWSC 1263 CASES CITED : Codelfa Constructions Pty Limited vState Rail Authority of NSW (1981) 149 CLR 337 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 State Rail Authority of New South Wales vEarthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in Liq) (1999) 160 ALR 588 Swain v Waverley Municipal Council [2005] HCA 4
PARTIES : Communications Design & Management Pty Limited - Plaintiff Richard Roth - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11181/2006
COUNSEL : Mr C A Vindin - Plaintiff Mr R de Meyrick - Defendant
SOLICITORS : S A Teen Solicitor - Plaintiff Chegwidden Solicitors - Defendant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Local Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 7330/2004
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Corbett LCM
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate