NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Omoregie v Peter Kaiser Simpson and P K Simpson & Co Pty Ltd trading as P K Simpson & Co [2007] NSWCA 202
HEARING DATE(S): 18 June 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 August 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Santow JA at 1; Tobias JA at 2; Handley AJA at 46
DECISION: (a) Leave to appeal refused; (b) Summons for leave to appeal dated 13 November 2006 dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS: LEGAL PRACTITIONERS – Liability for Negligence – Motor Accident – Where there was a successful Workers Compensation claim but solicitor failed to institute proceedings under the Motor Accidents Act for same injury – Where Motor Accidents claim likely to have been successful – Assessment of damages – Whether damages against solicitor should take into account requirement to repay Wokers Compensation out of any damages awarded for the original injury – Where likely award for damages for original injury would be less than Workers Compensation to be repaid – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – Where indemnity costs ordered at trial due to rejection of Calderbank offer – Where not possible for notional damages to exceed award requried to avoid further indemnity costs – Where new trial would be futile and contrary to claimant's interests - Supreme Court Rules 1 970 Pt 51 r 23(1).
Motor Accidents Act 1988 LEGISLATION CITED: Workers Compensation Act 1987 Supreme Court Rules 1970
CASES CITED: Kempsey District Hospital v Thackham (1995) 36 NSWLR 492
Peggy Omoregie PARTIES: Peter Kaiser Simpson P K Simpson & Co Pty Ltd t/as P K Simpson & Co
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 040507/06
COUNSEL: Cl: T McKenzie / Beukes Opp: G Curtin
SOLICITORS: Cl: Matthews Dooley & Gibson, Blacktown Opp: Colin Biggers & Paisley
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate