NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 161 A Crim R 121
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : NSW Crime Commission v Ollis [2006] NSWSC 316
HEARING DATE(S) : 13/3/2006, 16/3/2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 April 2006
JURISDICTION : Supreme Court
JUDGMENT OF : Rothman J
DECISION : Paragraphs [46]-[48] (Orders Made under s27 of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW)).
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL ASSETS RECOVERY - Immunity of witness to criminal charges - Immunity not to run to proceedings for recovery - Principles of construction - Perjury and Perverting Course of Justice - Fraud - Immunity from charge not affect existence of serious crime related criminal activity
LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Pollard v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) 28 NSWLR 659 Cabassi v Vila (1940) 64 CLR 130 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 79 ALJR 755; [2005] HCA 12 CASES CITED : R v Rogerson (1992) 174 CLR 268 Anthony Hordern & Sons v Amalgamated Clothing & Allied Trades Union of Australia (1932) 47 CLR 1 R v Wallis (1949) 78 CLR 529 Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union (2004) 78 ALJR 1231; [2004] HCA 40
NSW Crime Commission (P) Victor Warren Ollis (D1) Gail Anne Shields (D2) PARTIES : Aaron Gregory Lye (D3) Christopher Lye (D4) Koala Development Pty Ltd ACN 116 719 754 (D5) Parkes Airport Business Centre Pty Ltd ACN 116 261 913 (6) Parkes Airport Construction Pty Ltd ACN 117 091 737 (D7)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate