NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: O'Meara v R [2006] NSWCCA 131
16 May 2005 25 May 2005 HEARING DATE(S): 27 July 2005 28 July 2005 6 September 2005 7 September 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 28 April 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Simpson J at 1; Buddin J at 254; Hall J at 255
DECISION: (i) appeal against convictions dismissed; (ii) leave granted to appeal against sentences; (iii) each appeal against sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: appeal against conviction - charge of cultivate no less than commercial quantity of cannabis - two charges of unauthorised possession of firearm - appellant unrepresented at trial and on appeal - application for stay of proceedings - appellant unrepresented and indigent - application refused - appellant refused leave to appeal - grounds of appeal - appeal against refusal of stay - pre-trial voir dire - pre-trial procedures - - whether court should have held inquiry into appellant's fitness to be tried - appellant's medical fitness to continue with trial - appellant complains of voir dire being held in absence of jury - items taken from appellant's home in execution of two search warrants - bail conditions - evidence of identification of appellant - evidence alleged to have been illegally or improperly obtained - seizure of items in execution of search warrant - trespass to property - validity of search warrant - validity of certificate of identification of cannabis plants - evidence that shotgun was previously stolen - evidence of appellant's possession of police badge - evidence before jury in error - irregularity - no consequences - no miscarriage of justice - whether evidence illegally or improperly obtained - no such evidence - juror ineligibility - ground abandoned - alleged improper relationship between members of jury and members of prosecution team - no impropriety established - ground abandoned - execution of bench warrants during course of trial - alleged by appellant to have been observed by some jury members - ground abandoned - double jeopardy - certificate of dismissal of count of goods in custody - amendment of indictment - power to grant leave to amend indictment - separate trial of counts - abuse of process - official amnesty with respect to possession of firearms - firearms legislation repealed and replaced by time of trial - effect of repeal - prerepeal operation preserved by s30 Limitation Act 1987 - asserted bias of trial judge - post conviction remarks - no bias or reasonable apprehension of bias established - complaint about summing up - directions with respect to failure of accused person to give evidence - directions with respect to failure to call a witness - directions concerning firearms amnesty - verdict asserted to be unsafe and unsatisfactory - whether jury properly sworn - validity of indictment - whether appellant charged on indictment with offences that could only be prosecuted summarily - whether appellant initially charged under Firearms Act 1996 or Firearms Act 1989 - application for leave to appeal against sentence - comparable offender - whether irrelevant or unsubstantiated circumstances taken into account on sentencing - whether prior convictions wrongly taken into account - no error - appeal against conviction dismissed - leave granted to appeal against sentences - each appeal dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate