NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2006) NSW ConvR 56-156
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Barbara Anne Graham v Aluma-Lite Products Pty Ltd & 2 ors [2006] NSWSC 476
HEARING DATE(S) : 02.12.05, 20.12.05, 22.12.05, 08.02.06, 09.03.06, 16.03.06
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 May 2006
JUDGMENT OF : Nicholas J
DECISION : Para 75
CATCHWORDS : CONVEYANCING – Default under mortgage – Mortgagee's claim for possession – Whether mortgagee entitled to exercise rights under the mortgage – Estoppel – Anshun estoppel – Whether notices under s 7(1) Credit (Home Finance Contracts) Act 1984 and s 57(2)(b) Real Property Act 1900 sufficient – Whether caveat should be extended or removed
Conveyancing Act 1919 s 12 , s 92 LEGISLATION CITED : Credit (Home Finance Contracts) Act 1984 s 4, s 5, s 7, s 17 Limitation Act 1969 s 42(1)(b) Real Property Act 1900 s 12(1)(a), s 57(2), s 57(3), s 74J, s 74MA, s 124
Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No. 2) (1982) 150 CLR 139 Chamberlain v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 164 CLR 502 Dallal v Bank Mellat [1986] QB 441 CASES CITED : Graham v Aluma-Lite Pty Ltd (1996) 39 NSWLR 58 McIntosh v Shashoua (1931) 46 CLR 494 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1991) 147 CLR 589 Wongala Holdings Pty Ltd v Mulinglebar Pty Ltd (Unreported, NSWCA, 16 August 1994)
Barbara Anne Graham - plaintiff PARTIES : Aluma-Lite Products Pty Ltd - first defendant Registrar General of Lands Department (NSW) - second defendant Elmo Services Pty Ltd - third defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate