NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v SJRC [2007] NSWCCA 142
HEARING DATE(S): 24/04/07
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 May 2007
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Rothman J at 43; Harrison J at 59
DECISION: Appeal allowed
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Criminal Appeal Act s 5F(3A) - error of principle by trial judge - whether Crown case "substantially weakened"
LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act Evidence Act
A.E. Terry's Motors Ltd v Rinder [1948] SASR 167 Bonnard v London General Omnibus (1921) 38 RPC 1 Chatsworth Investments Ltd v Amoco (UK) Ltd [1968] 1 Ch 665 Commissioner for Superannuation v Scott (1987) 13 FCR 404 Henry Burford [1932] 2 Ch 122 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Marc A Hammond Pty Ltd v Papa Carmine Pty Ltd (1977) 28 FLR 160 O'Brien Glass Industries Limited v Cool and Sons Pty Ltd t/a Wagga Windscreen Service (1983) 77 FLR 441 Palser v Grinling [1948] A.C. 291 CASES CITED: R v Berrill [1982] Qd R 508 R v Blick (2000) 111 A Crim R 326 R v Kalajzich (1989) 39 A Crim R 415 R v Lameri [2004] NSWCCA 217 R v NKS [2004] NSWCCA 144 R v Shamouil [2006] NSWCCA 112 Re: Bonny [1986] 2 Qd.R 80 Re: Migliorini; ex parte Silk Brothers (1974) 22 FLR 491 Tillmanns Butcheries v AMIEU (1979) 42 FLR 331 Vickers v Regina (2006) 160 A Crim R 195
PARTIES: R v SJRC
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/668
COUNSEL: D U Arnott SC - Applicant P Hamill SC - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate