NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lawrence v Ramensky Lawyers & Ors [2006] NSWSC 175
HEARING DATE(S) : 15 March 2006
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 March 2006
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Harrison
DECISION : (1) The appeal is dismissed; (2) Leave to appeal is refused; (3) The costs assessor's decision of 11 November 2004 is affirmed; (4) The amended summons is dismissed; (5) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' cost as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Review decision of Costs Assessor and Review Panel
LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 - s 208L & M
Chapmans Ltd v Yandell [1999] NSWSC 361 Coulter v Regina (1987) 164 CLR 350 CASES CITED : Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 S H Lock & Co (Australasia) Limited v Rudders Ltd (1932) 49 WN(NSW) 65 Wentworth v Wentworth (NSWCA unreported 21 February 1996, 40374/95)
Wayne Lawrence (Plaintiff)
Gisela Ramensky (First Defendant) PARTIES : Carol Marjorie Hatzantonis (Second Defendant)
Roma Rachel Lawrence (Third Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 15744/2005
COUNSEL : Mr S A Benson (Defendants)
Wayne Lawrence (Plaintiff in person) SOLICITORS : Ramensky Lawyers (Defendants)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Costs Assessor
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 90162/2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate