NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Whitney v. Regina [2006] NSWCCA 243
HEARING DATE(S): 8 May 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 14 August 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Grove J at 24; Adams J at 25
DECISION: Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against conviction - Identification from photographs - Jury able to compare photographs with person before them - Appellant does not attend court on the appeal - Whether possible to say the jury could not reasonably be satisfied, beyond reasonable doubt, of identity of offender.
PARTIES: Shayne Nathan Whitney - appellant Regina - respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/341
COUNSEL: Mr. A.P. Cook for appellant Ms. V. Lydiard for respondent
SOLICITORS: Steve O'Connor, Legal Aid Commission, for appellant S. Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions, for respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): D04/11/1440
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Nicholson DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 19 August 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 2006/341 DC 04/11/1440
HODGSON JA GROVE J ADAMS J
Monday 14 August 2006 WHITNEY Shayne Nathan v. REGINA Judgment 1 HODGSON JA: On 21 March 2005, the appellant was indicted before Nicholson DCJ on the charge that he: On 29 August 2004 at Longueville in the State of New South Wales did rob Nicholas Marshall of a sum of money and two packets of cigarettes, the property of Vafimo Pty. Limited, trading as Caltex Starshop, Longueville. 2 The appellant pleaded not guilty, and was tried before his Honour and a jury. On 24 March 2005, the jury returned a verdict of guilty. 3 On 19 August 2005, the appellant was sentenced to a non-parole period of 1 year 6 months to commence on 21 September 2004 and expire on 20 March 2006, with the balance of term of 12 months to expire on 20 March 2007.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate