NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: (2007) Aust Torts Reports 81-910
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Amaca Pty Ltd (under NSW External Administration) v A B & P Constructions Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 220
HEARING DATE(S): 18 June 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 August 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Ipp JA at 92; Basten JA at 129
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: Negligence - manufacture of asbestos-based product - duty of care owed to consumers - whether error of law in formulation of duty of care - content of duty of care - no error - if had been error, would have been error of fact - whether error of law in determining breach - no failure properly to evaluate relevant factors - whether error of law in finding causation - causation not relevantly in issue at trial - was evidence on which causation could be found.
LEGISLATION CITED: Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989, s 32(1)
Anderson v The City of Enfield (1983) 34 SASR 472; Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512; Cole v South Tweed Heads Rugby League Football Club Ltd (2004) 217 CLR 468; Commissioner of Corrective Services v Walker [2007] NSWCA 213; Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562; Dovuro Pty Ltd v Wilkins (2001) 182 ALR 481; Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002) 211 CLR 540; Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd (1933) 50 CLR 387 (HC); Great Lakes Shire Council v Dederer (2006) Aust Torts Reports 81-860; [2006] NSWCA 101; Jones v Bartlett (2000) 205 CLR 166; Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery (2007) 81 ALJR 687; McPhersons Ltd v Eaton (2005) 65 NSWLR 187; Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre v Anzil (2000) 205 CLR 254; Nagle v Rottnest Island Authority (1993) 177 CLR 423; CASES CITED: Neindorf v Junkovic (2005) ALJR 341, (2005) 222 ALR 631; Norton Australia Pty Ltd v Streets Ice Cream Pty Ltd (1968) 120 CLR 635; Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Canberra and Goulburn v Habda (2005) 79 ALJR 1195; Sakoua v Williams (2005) 64 NSWLR 588; Seltsam Pty Ltd v Ghaleb [2005] NSWCA 208; Shellharbour City Council v Rigby [2006] NSWCA 308; (2006) 150 LGERA 11; Skulander v Willoughby City Council [2007] NSWCA 116; Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562; Swain v Waverley Municipal Council (2005) 220 CLR 517; Temora Shire Council v Stein (2004) LGERA 407; Thompson v Johnson & Johnson Pty Ltd (1989) ATR 80-278; Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 223 CLR 422; Whittelsea City Council v Merie [2005] VSCA 199; Woods v Multisport Holdings Pty Ltd (2002) 208 CLR 460; Wright v Dunlop Rubber Co Ltd (1972) KIR 255; Wyong Shire Concil v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate