NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 177 A Crim R 34
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: STUDMAN v COMMONWEALTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS [2007] NSWCA 285
HEARING DATE(S): 23 August 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 October 2007
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; McClellan CJ at CL at 2; Handley AJA at 56
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal revoked; 2. Appellant to pay the respondent's costs.
CATCHWORDS: Proceeds of crime – stealing Commonwealth property and defrauding the Commonwealth – appeal against dismissal of notice of motion – motion to transfer balance of property to defendant – appeal out of time– forfeiture of property – whether appeal futile – whether error in holding property was not proceeds of unlawful activity – whether property ought to be excluded from forfeiture
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Confiscation of Profits) Act 1985 (NSW) Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (Cth) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW)
Diez v DPP (Cth) (2004) 62 NSWLR 1 DPP (Cth) v Jeffrey (1992) 58 A Crim R 310 DPP v Saxon (1992) 28 NSWLR 263 Hadad (1989) 16 NSWLR 476 CASES CITED: Jeffrey v DPP (Cth) (1995) 79 A Crim R 514 King v DPP (2000) 114 A Crim R 14 Rintel (1991) 52 A Crim R 209 Saffron v DPP (Cth) (1989) 87 ALR 151 Taylor v Attorney-General (SA) (1991) 53 A Crim R 166 Woodcroft & Ors v Director of Public Prosecutions & Anor (2000) 174 ALR 60
PARTIES: Michael Simon Studman (Appl) Commonwealth DPP (Resp)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate